In the context of objective truth myth, which has been abolished by science, there is creative freedom obtained which concedes ambiguous acting and ipso facto gives admittance for far–reaching arbitrariness in justifying artistic assumptions. Creators are focused on searching for their own creations certain models for their creative activities; they form a theory of their own work in discontinuous way because each time a theory becomes appropriate for each artistic idea.
Therefore, the perception has become clear to all concerned that all the canons we had won so far within experience of temporariness and superfluity of established values and concepts became effaced. In addition, again there is an accompanying feeling of lack of acknowledgement for objective significance in using general predicates such as symbolic, semiotic, representative, stylistic, traditional …
Permanent experimentation to prove that art tends towards feasible entities.
Michael Walzer tries to curb the situation by finding justification for those pluralistic acts in a matter of esthetic approbation for dissimilarity, which is being treated as cultural form expressing variety of this world and functional approbation if dissimilarity is necessary condition for human development and gives sense to his autonomy.
